Files
code_of_conquest_dnd/docs/roadmap.md
2026-07-11 11:14:06 -05:00

97 lines
16 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Roadmap
Source of truth for scope is [`CLAUDE.md`](../CLAUDE.md). This tracks sequencing.
## The game — building the tactical CRPG (charter §17)
> **The POC's one question — *does bounded AI dialogue feel alive?* — is answered.** Bounded NPC dialogue, validated moves, and the DM loop are built and live-proven (M0M2). We are now building the game the mockups describe (§16, `/mockups`): a tactical CRPG across 11 screens.
The engine is done and proven. What's left is the **game on top of it** — recreated screen by screen against the mockups' shared visual system, on the canon log / DMNPC pipeline / bounded-moves / Luck / character-creation model we already built.
### Reconcile as we build (charter §17)
- **Damage determinism** — §7/§10 (deterministic) vs the Combat HUD mock's damage ranges → combat brainstorm (M5).
- **Class names** — §8 names vs the mock's callings (same archetypes) → character-creation brainstorm (M4).
### Out of scope (never / later)
Multiplayer (never) · mobile (later) · AI-generated story skeletons (v2) · credits/payments/auth (retrofit onto the proxy, §4).
## Sequencing
Status: ✅ done · ▶ next · ○ planned. Each item is its own spec → plan → implementation cycle.
Each carries its **§2 side** (state = code owns it · text = AI owns it · both = it is two systems), what it **depends on**, and the **milestone goal** it advances.
M0M2 built the **engine** (the contract, the client, the server loop, bounded dialogue) and answered the aliveness question. M3+ build the **game** — the CRPG screens/systems of the mockups, sequenced toward a playable vertical slice first, then breadth:
| Milestone | Goal it advances |
|---|---|
| **M0 — Foundations** ✅ | The contract and the client-side engine exist and are trustworthy. |
| **M1 — Prove the server loop** ✅ | A real model sits behind `/dm/narrate` and the pipeline is reusable. |
| **M2 — Prove aliveness** ✅ | **Does bounded AI dialogue feel alive?** — answered; bounded NPC dialogue + DM loop live-proven. |
| **M3 — Visual foundation & shell***here* | The `Theme` + the exploration HUD; every screen inherits the look and lives in the shell. |
| **M4 — Character creation** | The player enters the world; the proven stat/Luck model gets its UI. |
| **M5 — Tactical combat (gridless)** | Real stakes: the Combat HUD turn manager. |
| **M6 — Dialogue screen** | The proven NPC free-text loop inside the mock's conversation UI. |
| **M7 — Inventory & character sheet** | State the player can see and manage. |
| **M8 — World systems** | World-map travel, a shop economy, the quest log. |
| **M9 — Framing, AI-flavor & persistence** | Title/pause, save/load, and the Improviser/Banter/Luck-drift roles + fallback sweep. |
---
### M0 — Foundations ✅
-**Canon log + origin JSON-Schema contract** — api validation, unified 422 envelope (Plan A). *§2: state · foundation.*
-**Client canon log engine** — typed GDScript model (invariants in the model), new-game construction (origin + world + creation → canon log), turn-to-turn maintenance mutators, pure `[FACT]`/`[MOVE]`/`[ADJUST_DISPOSITION]` tag extractor (Plan B). *§2: state · depends on the contract.*
### M1 — Prove the server loop ✅
-**Narrator / Ollama pipeline (server)** — the shared server-side model-call pipeline (Ollama httpx client, role→model routing config, prompt loader + canon-log digest renderer, §10 call logging, single-retry → typed 502) wired through `/dm/narrate`. Non-streaming. Both phases landed: **(1) pipeline foundation** (`config`/`routing`/`prompts`/`ollama_client`/`call_log`), **(2) Narrator online** (authored `narrator.md` body + `narrate` service + gated live smoke). Server returns raw prose; the client extracts tags. **The other four roles become thin drop-ins on this pipeline.** Live wire proven against qwen3.5; 49 tests. Merged to `dev` (`ddc00d4`). *§2: text · depends on the contract.*
### M2 — Prove aliveness ✅ *(the POC's one question — build complete + live-proven; the *feel* is confirmed in playtest)*
-**Client HTTP loop** — client posts its canon log to `/dm/narrate`, displays the prose, harvests `[FACT]` via its `TagExtractor` into its own log, and shows the degraded-DM authored fallback (§13) on any non-200. First end-to-end vertical slice: **state → HTTP → model → prose → screen → fact-harvest.** Pure `DmService` core behind an injectable transport seam; throwaway harness scene for the first on-screen prose. **Live-proven** against qwen3.5 through Docker (grounded scene prose, no numbers per §7). 67/67 client tests; merged to `dev` (`b949cd2`). Surfaced + fixed two Docker-dev gaps in M1 (prompts not packaged, no container→host-Ollama route) — M1's live proof had been venv-on-host only. *§2: state (client owns the loop, consumes text) · goal: put the Narrator on screen.*
-**Bounded NPC conversation**`/npc/speak` with server-owned persona + `knowledge[]` (spoilers stay off the client) and client-computed `available_moves[]`; the client validates each emitted move against live state, applies the valid, silently drops the invalid, and always keeps the prose (§6). Server role is a thin drop-in on the M1 pipeline (`npc.run` mirrors `narrate.py`); the client added a pure `MoveValidator` (membership is the whole test) + a `MoveApplier` that writes town-NPC disposition to `GameState.npc_dispositions` (not the party log), plus `NpcContent.available_moves` as the single legality home. Free text goes straight to the NPC prompt (no Adjudicator needed — the moves are the NPC's). **Live-proven** against qwen3.5: Fenn answered in-voice, grounded strictly in his authored knowledge, no Luck leak (§7), with `reveal`/`offer_quest` moves landing. The live smoke also caught two real tag-format drifts a unit test can't — paren-less zero-arg moves and a dropped `MOVE:` prefix leaking into prose — both fixed by making `TagExtractor` tolerant/scrub-safe (backward-compatible; narrator path unaffected). Built on `feature/npc-conversation`; awaiting the human's `--no-ff` merge to `dev` (§18). *§2: both (text = the NPC's voice · state = the validated moves) · goal: answer the one question.*
-**Considering-state + transport timeout** — while a model call is in flight the client rotates authored in-character "the Master considers…" lines (§13 spirit — even *loading* is content; `ConsideringPhrases` + `ConsideringIndicator`, 3.0s cadence) instead of a frozen surface, and `HttpTransport` sets a request timeout (35s, rejects ≤0) so a hung call degrades to the authored fallback instead of spinning forever. Meets §14's anti-freeze *goal* by **reframing** the wait, on the *proven* non-streaming loop, with no new failure surface. **Human-confirmed live** including the degrade path (API down → fallback). Merged to `dev` (`099714d`); 110/110 client tests. *§2: text/UI · goal: the wait is framed (in-character) and bounded (never hangs).*
- ~~**Streaming** (§14)~~ — **SHELVED for the POC.** Real token streaming would genuinely *hide* the ~2s call, but it is the POC's largest transport rework (client `HTTPRequest` → poll-based `HTTPClient`) and adds mid-stream error/tag-boundary failure surface not worth the risk. The considering-state above reframes the wait instead and is tested and live. Design kept as a record (`specs/2026-07-10-narrator-streaming-design.md`, banner SHELVED); revive only if playtest proves the wait genuinely hurts. Conscious deviation from §14's "stream everything," recorded per §18.
Each screen is recreated as a Godot 4.7 Control-node scene against the mockups (§16); each `.dc.html`'s `Component` class is the behavior spec. Sequenced toward a playable vertical slice (shell → creation → combat → dialogue) first, then breadth.
### M3 — Visual foundation & shell ✅
-**Shared `Theme`** — palette tokens, the three font families, and reusable styleboxes (parchment card, dark panel, primary CTA, tab, item tile, tag/chip) from the mock README as a Godot `Theme` resource. Every screen pulls from it; build it first so the look is one system. Merged to `dev`. *§2: n/a (presentation) · depends on nothing · goal: one consistent visual identity.*
-**Main Window shell (2a)** — the exploration HUD: isometric world-view slot + the permanent DM "narration book" (wired to the proven `/dm/narrate` loop + considering-state), the turn-order rail, minimap slot, the slide-in system dock (Inventory/Character/Quest/Map/Party/Spellbook toggles), and the bottom command bar (HP/MP/gold, consumables, End Turn). The frame everything else lives in. **Established the editor-first UI-scene convention** (ADR [0001](adr/0001-editor-first-ui-scenes.md); how-to in `client/docs/README.md`) and added Button-base `DockButton`/`ParchmentButton` + a base `RichTextLabel` prose style to the theme. *§2: state (client owns the HUD, consumes DM text) · depends on the DM loop (M2) · goal: the game's main screen, on screen.*
-**Title screen** — new game / continue / load / settings; the entry point. Author it editor-first (ADR 0001). *§2: n/a · depends on the Theme · goal: first impression, into the world.*
### M4 — Character creation
-**Character creation UI** — the mock's screen over our proven model: race + calling cards, six stats with **LCK hidden entirely** (§7), 3d6 floors, the **+3 additive-only spend-up** pool (§8, matches the `character-creation-stats` model), live origin blurb + nameplate. **Reconcile class names** here (§8 vs the mock's callings). Feeds new-game canon-log construction (already built). *§2: state · depends on the creation model (M0) + Theme · goal: build a character.*
### M5 — Tactical combat (gridless)
-**Combat turn manager + HUD** — the Combat HUD `Component` state machine as GDScript: initiative order, the action economy (Action/Bonus/Move), ability resolution, click-to-target, victory/defeat; tokens on the iso board as **flavor only, no movement grid** (§10). Seeded per encounter (§10). **Reconcile damage determinism** here (§7/§10 vs the mock's ranges). Combat flavor is async optional Narrator calls (reuses M1). *§2: state (flavor text a thin AI layer) · depends on the pipeline for flavor · goal: real stakes.*
### M6 — Dialogue screen
-**Dialogue UI + reshaped Adjudicator** — wrap the *proven* NPC free-text loop (`/npc/speak`, M2) in the mock's conversation screen: NPC portrait, live disposition meter, the NPC's spoken line + DM narration beat, and the **hybrid** input (choice chips with skill/approach tags **plus** the free-text line, §15). The **Adjudicator** (`/dm/adjudicate`, strict JSON §12, one-retry) lands here as the interpreter for the free-text "describe your own action" escape hatch — most turns use buttons. *§2: both (text = NPC voice · state = validated moves/actions) · depends on the NPC role (M2) · goal: conversation inside the game's UI.*
### M7 — Inventory & character sheet
-**Inventory & equipment** — the paper-doll (12 slots) + Satchel grid, category tabs, item detail, encumbrance, derived stats; item seed-data from the mock's `items()` map as `Resource`s. *§2: state · depends on the Theme + item model · goal: gear the player manages.*
-**Character sheet** — attributes (modifier-forward, LCK still hidden), saving throws, the "in a fight" derived grid, skills, talents, afflictions/conditions, the DM's-notes bio. *§2: state (display) · depends on the stat model · goal: the character, legible.*
### M8 — World systems
-**World-map travel** — region map, location markers (settlement/dungeon/fog), roads + planned route, danger ratings, travel time, set-out. *§2: state · depends on the shell · goal: move between places.*
-**Shop economy** — buy/sell with a fence: purses, stock/owned, the ~40%-sell loop, gritty disabled-CTA reasons, merchant reaction lines. *§2: state (merchant reaction = a thin authored/AI layer) · depends on inventory · goal: an economy loop.*
-**Quest log** — active/completed/failed tabs, objectives checklists, rewards, tracked quest; reads the canon log's `active_quests` (§11). *§2: state · depends on the quest model · goal: track the story.*
### M9 — Framing, AI-flavor & persistence
-**Save / load + pause / settings** — the pause overlay + data-driven settings; save/load over the canon log + game state (seeds preserved, §10). *§2: state · depends on the systems existing · goal: persistence + framing.*
-**Luck fully wired** — generation exists (Plan B); this adds **drift events** (real bed, shrine blessing, killing something praying), **one shrine**, **one cursed item** (+STR / LCK). Visible only in prose (§7). Gates the Improviser. *§2: state · depends on the item + event systems · goal: the signature system, live.*
-**Improviser**`/dm/improvise`: minor off-script events, **§7-sandboxed by construction** — a validator that only applies whitelisted state changes (dignity, never progress; structurally incapable of ending a quest). Fires on Luck; hooks Cadwyn. *§2: both · depends on Luck being wired · goal: bad luck as a story, not a fine.*
-**Banter**`/party/banter`: companions comment on recent events; low stakes, high charm, **aggressively cacheable**; reads Brannoc's humiliation log (§9), stacking not overwriting. Prose only, no tags. *§2: text · depends on the humiliation log (M0) + events · goal: the comedy loop closes.*
-**Authored-fallback sweep** — every AI-dependent surface has authored fallback *content* (§13), written as writing; the final pass so no surface can show the player an error. *§2: text · depends on every surface existing · goal: a degraded DM still has a voice.*
### Deferred (later / never)
Replicate provider (prod) · auth · metering · credits/payments (§4) — retrofit onto the pipeline later, the game doesn't notice. AI-generated story skeletons (v2 — the seeded story is authored for now). Streaming (§14) — SHELVED (`specs/2026-07-10-narrator-streaming-design.md`); the considering-state reframes the wait instead.
#### NPC & relationship depth (v2)
Three ideas mined from [NarrativeEngine-P](https://github.com/Sagesheep/NarrativeEngine-P) (MIT) — design borrowed, not code. All three are **§2: state** (code owns them; the AI only voices from what code decides), so they strengthen the §2 boundary rather than loosen it. They fold into the NPC role (§6) and canon log (§11); sequence them **with or after the Dialogue screen (M6)**, since they enrich the same conversation surface.
-**Directional dispositions** — split the single per-pair disposition into two directed fields (A→B and B→A), so liking is asymmetric. Unrequited regard, undisclosed betrayal (player still trusts the captain who already sold them out), and the Cadwyn↔Brannoc mutual-but-differently-flavored dislike (§9) all become expressible. Player→NPC gates dialogue *tone*; NPC→player gates *offered moves* (§6 `available_moves`) — two arrows, two levers. Extends `party[]` in the canon log (§11) and `npc_dispositions` on the client; keep the 100..100 range, just double the field. *§2: state · depends on the disposition model existing (M2, done) · goal: relationships that aren't symmetric.*
-**Witness tracking** — every logged event carries a `witnesses: [...]` list; a fact enters an NPC's `knowledge[]` (§6) only if they witnessed it or a witness told them. This is the missing **input-side rule** for the knowledge list — CLAUDE.md §6 says the list is "the entire content the NPC has to draw on" but never says how a fact gets *in*. Structurally prevents the blacksmith spoiling a twist he never saw, gives shady acts real "were you seen?" stakes without a stealth system, and turns rumor spread into a code operation (witness meets NPC → code copies the fact, optionally degraded) rather than AI invention. Adds a field to `recent_events[]`/`established_facts[]` (§11) and a propagation rule on character encounters. *§2: state · depends on the canon log event model (M0, done) + knowledge lists (§6) · goal: NPCs know only what they could plausibly know.*
-**Personality Hexagon persona** — a richer NPC persona schema: six axes (Drive, Diligence, Boldness, Warmth, Empathy, Composure) supplied to the NPC prompt (§6) as structured voice-shaping input, replacing free-form persona blurbs. Server-owned (like `knowledge[]`), so it never ships to the client. Purely additive to the §6 prompt contract — it steers *how* an NPC speaks, not *what* it may do (the move vocabulary is unchanged). *§2: state (the schema) feeding text (the voice) · depends on the NPC role (M2, done) · goal: consistent, distinct NPC voices from data, not prose.*